| Some Tests That I took... |
[Mar. 26th, 2006|06:33 pm] |
Baby Name Style Test:
Kre8tyve
You scored 38 popularity, 46 history, 64 creativity, and 44 texture! |
| You like uncommon, unfamiliar, creative names that seem sparkley and happy. Maybe you like a popular name, but plan to spell it differently, so instead of being Emily and having a quiet, ordinary life, your kid with be Eighmoeley and spend a large percentage of her life explaining to people how her name is spelled and pronounced. Instead of being called Emily A, B, or C, the kids in her class will call her Eighmoeley with the fykked-upp spyllyng. Well, it's your baby, so you can go wylde wyth y's and k's. Keep in mind that you'll have to remember the spelllin that yooo yuse. If yu spell it Mikeighlyaa on the birth certificate and then Mykeighlaa on the insurance card, shee's going tu thynk yu fyrgut, ore yooo dunt kaar. Other catagories with names you might like are: Weird Magic, Youneek, Tryndee, Legendary The naming style most unlike yours is Classic. You probably think names like John and Mary are boring, common, and generic. It's not likely you'll find many names to agree on with somone who has that naming style. |
 |
My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
|
You scored higher than 19% on popularity |
|
You scored higher than 34% on history |
|
You scored higher than 83% on creativity |
|
You scored higher than 11% on taste |
|
Interestingly enough, many of the names that I like come from historical sources or books that I've read.
Some of the names that I like for girls are:
* Octavia
* Ginevra
* Logan
* Colson
* Tana
Some of the names I like for boys are:
* Logan
* Zephiniah
* D'Artagnan
* Sebastian
* Alyosha
According to this test, these are my political leanings.
Though with some of the questions, like many of the same sorts of tests, the answer to be given would be dependant on what the situation was.
Then there's the "What type of Human Are You? test:
Sister Mary DoGood
You scored 81% Do Gooder, 42% Drive, and 64% Intellect! |
You are truly a kind, warm, and caring person who loves others (especially fuzzy bunnies), but your fault is that you don't really get out there and do stuff yourself. You're more apt to lend an ear or a shoulder than do get something concrete done...which is to say that you're a bit lazy. But you manage to keep yourself amused and you're definitely not a stupid person which is nice. Get thee to a nunnery...you can get lots of reading done and pass on those good thoughts.
All human being categories are: Lazy SOB, Rebel w/out a Cause, Evil Mastermind, Henchman, Criminal, Dictator, Frat Boy, Socialite, Philosopher, Stunt Double, Upstanding Citizen, Teacher, Cheerleader, Sister Mary DoGood, Benefactor, Loyal Sidekick, Candy Striper, Goody Two-Shoes. |
 |
This test tracked 3 variables. How the score compared to the other people's:
|
Higher than 91% on Do Gooder |
|
Higher than 9% on Drive |
|
Higher than 40% on Intellect | |
I am so not becoming a nun.
This test was to anyalize my learning style.
No VAK Preference
You are 36% visual, 47% auditory and 42% kineaethetic |
| You have no clear preference for the senses you use to learn and communicate. |
|
My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
|
You scored higher than 38% on visual |
|
You scored higher than 26% on auditory |
|
You scored higher than 84% on kine |
|
Okay, so apparently I have to use all of my senses to best learn things. This might prove useful later. And, no, I'm not taking these results as gospel truth to dictate my life. That would kind of defeat the point of it wouldn't you agree? |
|
|
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=92.1){kind=small}
senkyounosakami's journal
restless
sick
content
still manic
accomplished
creative
bouncy
exhausted
depressed
